In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, two prominent language models have emerged as powerhouses for assisting developers in their coding endeavours - Claude 3 and GPT-4. Both models exhibit remarkable capabilities, but when it comes to coding, which one proves to be the superior companion? In this article, we'll explore and compare the performance of Claude 3 and GPT-4 in various coding scenarios.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/516a1/516a1b0ec7b9f3d4a391799bad8e52a5c3ce186d" alt=""
What is Claude 3 and GPT-4?
Claude 3 is the latest model of Large Language Model (LLM) from Anthropic, a company mainly focus on AI research. The model is capable of multiple tasks like Real-time Multilingual Processing, Code Generation and Vision Analysis for static image. There are three model in Claude 3 family: Haiku, Sonnet and Opus. In this article, we will choose Claude 3 Sonnet for comparison.
GPT-4 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4) is the newest large multimodal model developed by OpenAI, which is also a company concentrate on AI. The model shows its strong ability of text and image processing. As a transformer-based model, it return learning feedback base on pre-trained data, which is collected from public and licensed from third-party providers.
Coding Scenario 1: Short Scripting
Description: write a short Python script to fetch data from an API and display it.
GPT-4:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afb70/afb70399c9c3329b2b44d2c9ecbd9c05d20fb773" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a328/3a3284fbbadfdbebe27c2620188ef57f5bfa2c26" alt=""
Claude 3 Sonnet:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87d26/87d266e225e7f64c8aab4e83b7e5b5bf4452dc9f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fe04/8fe0454cc4151e2d06145d0c6546b2632bf6f023" alt=""
Consideration:
The second script is more considerable for handling exception and easily adapted to different APIs. In the meantime, the first script fail to compile and throw a KeyError. Claude 3 Sonnet won this case!
Coding Scenario 2: Complex Algorithm Design
Description: Write a python solution to solve knapsack problem
GPT-4:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/675ec/675ec5845728562ba37d6bb7008491275863ab09" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc5e0/bc5e08ca8c43551e50e33fa5531835d237b62530" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ac45/8ac45de5882255580f08f14af1a084b88cf91e5d" alt=""
Claude 3 Sonnet:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b388/8b388072bf0ec055edeaa1548726aecda2272a00" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a481/7a481971bd6fe321f7abb994c0a935e3d6ff9091" alt=""
Consideration:
Both models return the same method (dynamic programming) for solving this problem. However, the result from GPT-4 provides more inline comment, which is essential in software developing. In the meantime, Claude 3 Sonnet provides a clear explanation for the whole algorithm. Each model performs well in this part.
Conclusion
In coding generation, Claude 3 Sonnet provides a more comprehensive explanation as well as fewer mistakes occurred. However, since these two models are different in model design principles, with more authenticated and pre-trained data for GPT-4, it is possible for GPT-4 to provide a more comprehensive result in the future.